Thursday, June 27, 2013

What a nifty house-ruled D&D (Palladium Fantasy 1st)

Hello? I hope there’re still people reading this blog. Apologies for my latest absence. Of late, at my excruciating small chances of spare time, I decided to give priority to my Curse of the Crimson Throne campaign instead of this blog. We’re in the middle of Skeletons of Scarwall (the 5th book) and just finished our 26th session. The entire game has been an awesome experience, with episodes of both exhilarating fun and heartbreaking choices. In other words: the perfect campaign. And exactly because of this I’m getting anxious to give my players a proper and cool ending to the entire ride. So, again, apologies for the radio silence. Time to quickly share my last game reading:


Before proceeding, let me backtrack a little. I bought RIFTs some 15 years ago. At the time I had just discovered AD&D 2nd (besides learned English) and Vampire the Masquerade. I was hunting “big classics” for my RPG collection. After reading a few DRAGON Magazines and certain sites (oh, my first years of Internet…) I discovered RIFTs and found the entire “magic-technological post-apocalyptic multiverse” premise awesome and bold (I was a teenager). So I snatched a copy from Amazon and…

…what a mess. I was hugely disappointed. The book was a disaster in terms of rules and presentation and the setting made no sense (I was a teenager that had just read Vampire and Castle Falkenstein… RPGs were supposed to be “setting-serious” and mechanically elegant for me).

The end of the tale: RIFTs was one of those rare RPGs that I decided to sell back (and I only did that thrice so far. Yeah, I regretted two of those sells and was forced to buy stuff back).

Lets advance a few (quite a few) years. Today I’m older and wiser… OK, not wiser, but I take myself (and my hobbies) less serious. I’m also more curious and I learned a lot. RIFTs is still an irreparable mess for me, but I learned to love its kitchen-skin insanity (and Savage World my save the setting). I enjoy RIFTs especially for fun-crazy games and post-apocalyptic mayhem (I have Apocalypse World for more “personal/dramatic” stuff).

After Swords & Wizardry brought the first RPGs to my attention, I discovered the Palladium Fantasy Role-Playing Game Revised Edition. I even managed to grab a used (but NM) copy here in Brazil. Boy, what a beautiful piece of work! Now I see where Siembieda got his fans from. This RPG is basically a considerably house-ruled version of D&D (much like the beginnings of Runequest/BRP), with lots and lots of great ideas.

You got 8 attributes and lots of classes (or O.C.C.s) with many prerequisites, reminding me of AD&D 1st. And Siembieda’s way of painfully detailing each class is really nice for flavor (if sometimes tiresome). Skills are %-based and go up with each level (useful, but nothing new). You even got saving throws. Now, some of the bits that I really liked to see in such an old game:


  • Your initial hit points are equal to your Constitution (called here P.E.) and all PCs gain 1d6 hit points per level after that;
  • Multiclass rules are relatively simply and (sort of) make sense;
  • There isn’t a general combat matrix, THAC0 or BAB; instead of those each class gains different bonus to damage, strike, dodge, parry, critical hits, extra attacks and other stuff at different levels; and those bonuses aren’t high, capping around +5/+6 (take that D&D Next!);
  • Fighting man classes are the only ones to attack more than once per round (and also gain an automatic parry);
  • Attacks are deadly simple: roll d20 and score 4+; if the enemy is wearing armor you have to beat the armor’s AC (usually 5-19); if you hit an armored enemy you must first pass through his armor’s hit points;
  • The rules for spellcasting are simple and (better yet!) make the presence of allied fighters almost obligatory;
  • Most spellcasters have a limited number of spells per day, that they can cast in any combination; their spells also get stronger (Spell Strength) through small bonus gained at different levels;
  • There’re rules for traditional wizards (with some cool innovations like the magic cauldron ritual); warlocks (exotic elemental priest/mages); witches (your usual Salem-satanic breed); diabolists (very cool take on a symbol/glyph-based caster); summoners (the most dangerous and cool archetype, that deals with circles and summoning); clerics (your base priest); druids (with cool rules for shapechanging); and shamans. Each class has the same basic structure, but the various mini-systems are very fun;
  • The wizards have a very simple rule that is totally vancian and deserves to be mentioned: they can cast spells of ANY level. They just need to find and learn the dweomer (found a 9th level spell? You lucky punk). Totally Dying Earth;
  • Many spells or O.C.C.’s abilities have detrimental or dangerous side-effects in case of failure (lots of sadistic tables);
  • Simple rules for monsters (with very few stats) and deities (with useful stats!).


Of course, we’re talking about a Palladium RPG book, so you also have all kinds of eccentricities from its author (like ‘Homosexuality’ as a type of insanity, probably its most famous example). But what I found very interesting is how many of Palladium Fantasy’s rules are excellent “fixes” (or house rules) for many D&D campaigns. This is a medium-crunch yet simple and engaging fantasy RPG, with lots of open space to be filled by the Gamemaster and players who’re interested in Old School games and don’t mind trying something different (there’s even a setting at the book’s end).

P.S.: I’m aware that Palladium Fantasy 2nd and following books are considerably different and that the supplements really bloated this game in terms of setting and rules. However, the core book alone is a wonderful RPG (like the Forgotten Realms “Grey Box”, which taken as a “one book setting” is a such an amazing resource).

4 comments:

  1. Wow, this is a revelation for me, I DMed a very custom version of AD&D with a lot of fixes and twists that came from the palladium robotech rpg , (mostly how combat and progression was handled) for a very long time, funny now how things came up, I remember being mocked and look over by more experienced players with a more "purist" approach. Now I realize that it was not only a very popular "home fix" but that modern games came up with very similar conclusions and implementations on their own. I'm very thrill to check on Pathfinder products and see how close I was from the modern standard!

    Thanks for your blogging

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks 'Tu padre'! I'm glad you enjoy it. I knew RIFTS for years, but never thought that their initial game was a AD&D-homebrew.

      Delete
  2. Sorry to dig up such an old post with a new comment, but you got combat a little bit wrong (if it works though, keep playing it how you've been!)

    Any roll above a four, so 5-20, will strike in hand to hand combat. I don't see it in the 1st (or even 2nd) edition of Palladium Fantasy, but in other Megaverse games, ranged attacks need a 9 or higher to strike, and I believe can only be dodged with no bonuses and a -4.

    A roll of 5 or higher will hit your opponent. If they're wearing armor, a roll of 5 through their Armor Rating will strike the armor; dealing damage to its SDC. A roll above their AR will strike them; either hitting them where the armor doesn't cover, or piercing a weak point, and deals damage to their HP.

    I grew up with Palladium (they're based not too far from my home!) I've bounced around in many other systems (LOVE me some GURPS or old school D&D or d6 Star Wars), but I've always loved the Palladium system (well, for a while class based RPGs bothered me, but I've come back around, though point buy still feels more "realistic").

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comment, Joe. I only have the 1st Edition of Palladium Fantasy with me and... to be honest.. I can't find any different rule regarding ranged attacks (at least, if there are any, they are REALLY hidden somewhere). But thanks for letting me know the rules of game, I quite like the distinction.

      Delete